Conclusions On Motherland Reborn 

Considerable evidence has been assembled to support the contention that the human species once rose to high and even interstellar civilization in a motherland which raised us, though she did not bear us, and that this motherland was Australia. It confirms that the Chinese records are correct when they suggest that this occurred about two million years ago. The rise and fall and the final destruction of this civilization about 50,000 years ago has been documented. 

The ancient understanding of the one creative Holy Spirit and his assistants, the gods and goddesses, has been documented and shown to be supported by the Biblical records which are common to Jews, Christians and Muslims. 

The means by which the creator apparently plans to restore the original unity of humankind through the re-establishment of the ancient bloodline royal in the original motherland has been explored through numerous prophecies in the Bible and elsewhere. 

The mechanism by which the creator appears to intend to achieve this end have been explored, and it would seem that He intends to place a linear descendant of King David and Jesus Christ on the throne of the motherland by means of the British throne. This descendant would appear to be the rightful heir to the Merovingian dynasty of France, and, by a perpetual treaty made in the time of King Clovis, he would also be the lawful overlord of the Papacy. 

Because we have just entered the astrological age of Aquarius and a long awaited new Great Year of the precession of the equinoxes, the appearance of this hitherto hidden King appears imminent, a King through whom the spirit of the creator can and will work. 

We have a number of prophetic indications in respect to the nature of this King. Although he could apparently, at need, call upon the potent forces in the heavens, which are at his command, the prophet Isaiah tells us that he will save us by his knowledge, just his knowledge. The author, for one, would be much more impressed by useful and relevant knowledge, than he would by mere manifestations of brute force. 

In the same context, though scripture says that God will himself give the throne of David to this long awaited King, to impose such a king on us simply by brute force is not in keeping with what the author considers to be reasonable and viable in the longer term. No imposed rule ever seems to have been for the long term good of the governed. It seems to the author that there will be a lawful claim that this king can make on the British throne that will supersede the claim of its incumbent Queen and her heirs. This is, however, mere speculation unless substantiated by future events; just as it is speculation that Princess Anne of England is destined for a major role in world events.